Ron Halbrook, 3505 Horse
Run Ct., Shepherdsville, KY 40165 [See articles: Guardian of Truth, 8-15 & 9-5,
1996]
MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, & REMARRIAGE:
Distinguishing Judgments from Departures
THE PRINCIPLE REVEALED
But I say unto you, That whosoever
shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her
to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced
committeth adultery (Matt. 5:32).
And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put
away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another,
committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit
adultery (Matt. 19:9).
Whosoever shall put away his wife, and
marry another, committeth adultery against her. And if a woman shall put
away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery (Mk.
10:11-12).
Whosoever putteth away his wife, and
marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is
put away from her husband committeth adultery (Lk. 16:18).
In short, God’s law requires one man to
be married to one woman for a lifetime. One and only one exception is
given. When one mate commits an act of immorality, the innocent partner is
permitted (though not required) to put away his or her mate, and to marry
another. |
DIVISION INEVITABLE DIVISION NOT
INEVITABLE
1. Theories Contradict Fundamental Rule or Law Given by
Christ (Matt. 5:32; 19:9)
2. Appeal to Silence & Absence of Specific Prohibition
Rather Than Positive Authority (1 Pet. 4:11)
3. Theory Breeds Looseness on Other Moral & Doctrinal
Issues (2 Tim. 2:16; 3:13; 2 Cor. 6:17; Eph. 5:11)
4. Won’t Tolerate Open Study & Discussion of Issues (Acts
17:11; 1 Pet. 3:15; 2 Tim. 4:2-4; 1 Jn. 2:19) |
1. All Appeal to Same Fundamental Rule or Law Given by
Christ (Matt. 5:32; 19:9)
2. All Appeal to Positive Authority, Not Silence (1 Pet.
4:11)
3. Different Views Breed No Looseness on Other Moral &
Doctrinal Issues (Acts 15:36-40; Rom. 14:6; I Cor. 6:12)
4. Encourage Open Study & Discussion of Issues (Acts 17:11;
1 Pet. 3:15; 2 Tim. 4:2-4; 1 Jn. 2:19) |
p. 2 MDR: Judgments, Departures |
THE PRINCIPLE REVEALED:
Matt. 5:32; 19:9; Mk. 10:11-12; Lk.
16:18
In short, God’s law requires one man to
be married to one woman for a lifetime. One and only one exception is
given. When one mate commits an act of immorality, the innocent partner is
permitted (though not required) to put away his or her mate, and to marry
another. |
JUDGMENTS:
DEPARTURES:
Fine Tuning Some Points of Application Deny, Destroy the
Principle
1. Male Must Initiate Divorce?
2. Annul Under-Aged
Marriage, Marry Later?
3. Get Out of
Unscriptural Marriage, Marry Later?
4. Answer to 3.
Depend on Whether Knew 1st One Was Unscriptural When Married?
5. Answer to 3.
Depend on Whether Deceived?
6. Answer to 3.
Depend on Details of Divorce?
7. Any Separation,
Grounds, How Long?
8. 1 Cor. 7:5 Only
Principle Apply to Separation?
9. 1 Cor. 7:5 Mean
Submit to Drunken Demands, Violence, Perversion?
10. Remain If Wife &
Child Endangered?
11. Legal Steps to
Get Out of Harm’s Way?
12. After Divorce for
Fornication, Reconcile?
13. Answer to 12.
Depend on Whether Guilty Had Entered Subsequent Marriage?
14. 1st
Mate Die, Put-away Fornicator Remarry?
15. When Man Leaves
Faithful Wife Over Her Protest to Marry Another, Does His Adultery Give
Her the Ground to Appeal to God to Dissolve Her Marriage Bond?
16. If So, May She
Marry Again, Or Does She Remain Bound to Him?
17. In Divorce for
Fornication, Does It Matter Who Initiates Legal Action?
18. If Fornicator
Sues for Divorce, Must Innocent Mate Countersue?
19. On 18., If They
Sue in Separate Courts, Does It Matter Who Sued 1st, Which Case
Is Decided 1st, Etc.
20. If man Drives Out
Wife by Abuse, Violence, Etc., & Then Commits Adultery, May She Divorce
Him for It?
21. Since He Drove
Her Out 1st, Would Her Right to Remarry Depend on Who Got to
Court 1st? |
1. Homosexual Marriage
2. Polygamy
3. Put-away
Fornicator May Marry New mate
4. Marriage Law Not
Apply to Alien Sinner
5. Baptism Sanctify
Adulterous Marriage
6. Deserted Believer
Marry New Mate
7. Redefine Adultery
as Non-sexual
8. Repentance Not
Require Removal from Unscriptural Marriage
9. No Matter Why
Divorce, May Take New mate
10. God Accept All
Marriages Accepted by Legal System
|
In spite of the above study guide handed out to the
brethren in Athens, GA. on July 27-28, 2000, along with the documented
discussion of this subject, Ron and his associates continue to deny that
he is really “teaching it.” See
An excerpt of Ron Halbrook’s MDR discussion at Athens, Georgia
and
“I’m Still Studying It”
In
the April, 2001 issue of Gospel Truths (a year after
the Athens, GA. Discussion), brother J. T. Smith asked Ron to comment on
the following question:
“A husband decides to put away his wife and she
begs him not to. He decides to go ahead and do it anyway. She goes to the church
and elders and voices her opposition to it. The divorce is final. A few years
later the husband remarries. She then goes before the church and elders and
expresses to them that she is now scripturally putting him away. She can then
remarry without sin.”
In
response to the above scenario question
brother Halbrook wrote:
“As to your question, I see the problems and
issues raised by a marriage under such circumstances and would not encourage
such a remarriage…”
On page 9 of his April 2001 Gospel Truths
article (“Why Halbrook Fellowships...”), Ron also refers back to a letter
that brother Smith wrote to him February 17, 1993. In that letter, J. T. stated
he had heard that Ron believed this scenario: “When a man puts away his wife
for any cause other than fornication and he subsequently marries another, his
first wife then may put him away for fornication and she has the scriptural
right to marry another.” To this charge, Ron states, “My letter
dated February 27, 1993 explained that I do not (emp. his) believe
or teach such a view.”
Brethren, as one of the numerous men who have been
tossed to and fro by all of Ron’s double talk through the years, I have
come to find that brother Halbrook has been less than honest about this issue.
See the mountain of evidence contrary to his claim (cf. numerous sound
clips included) which proves the post-divorce “putting away” for
post-divorce fornication doctrine that Ron has been publicly teaching since from
at least 1983. –Jeff
|