| 
 Ron Halbrook, 3505 Horse 
Run Ct., Shepherdsville, KY 40165 [See articles: Guardian of Truth, 8-15 & 9-5, 
1996] 
MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, & REMARRIAGE: 
Distinguishing Judgments from Departures  
THE PRINCIPLE REVEALED  
  
    
      | 
       
         But I say unto you, That whosoever 
      shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her 
      to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced 
      committeth adultery (Matt. 5:32). 
      
         And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put 
      away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, 
      committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit 
      adultery (Matt. 19:9). 
      
         Whosoever shall put away his wife, and 
      marry another, committeth adultery against her. And if a woman shall put 
      away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery (Mk. 
      10:11-12). 
      
         Whosoever putteth away his wife, and 
      marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is 
      put away from her husband committeth adultery (Lk. 16:18). 
      
         In short, God’s law requires one man to 
      be married to one woman for a lifetime. One and only one exception is 
      given. When one mate commits an act of immorality, the innocent partner is 
      permitted (though not required) to put away his or her mate, and to marry 
      another.   | 
     
   
 
DIVISION INEVITABLE               DIVISION NOT 
INEVITABLE  
  
    
      | 
       
      1. Theories Contradict Fundamental  Rule or Law Given by 
      Christ (Matt. 5:32; 19:9) 
      
      2. Appeal to Silence & Absence of Specific Prohibition 
      Rather Than Positive Authority (1 Pet. 4:11) 
      
      3. Theory Breeds Looseness on Other Moral & Doctrinal 
      Issues (2 Tim. 2:16; 3:13; 2 Cor. 6:17; Eph. 5:11) 
      
      4. Won’t Tolerate Open Study & Discussion of Issues (Acts 
      17:11; 1 Pet. 3:15; 2 Tim. 4:2-4; 1 Jn. 2:19)  | 
      
       
      1. All Appeal to Same Fundamental  Rule or Law Given by 
      Christ (Matt. 5:32; 19:9)  
      
      2. All Appeal to Positive Authority, Not Silence (1 Pet. 
      4:11) 
  
      
      3. Different Views Breed No Looseness on Other Moral & 
      Doctrinal Issues (Acts 15:36-40; Rom. 14:6; I Cor. 6:12) 
      
      4. Encourage Open Study & Discussion of Issues (Acts 17:11; 
      1 Pet. 3:15; 2 Tim. 4:2-4; 1 Jn. 2:19)  | 
     
   
 
    
  
    
      | p. 2 MDR: Judgments, Departures | 
     
   
 
   
    
      | 
       
      THE PRINCIPLE REVEALED: 
      Matt. 5:32; 19:9; Mk. 10:11-12; Lk. 
      16:18 
      
         In short, God’s law requires one man to 
      be married to one woman for a lifetime. One and only one exception is 
      given. When one mate commits an act of immorality, the innocent partner is 
      permitted (though not required) to put away his or her mate, and to marry 
      another.   | 
     
   
 
  
JUDGMENTS:       
                              DEPARTURES: 
Fine Tuning Some Points of Application                 Deny, Destroy the 
Principle 
  
    
      | 
       
      1. Male Must Initiate Divorce? 
      2. Annul Under-Aged 
      Marriage, Marry Later? 
      3. Get Out of 
      Unscriptural Marriage, Marry Later? 
      4. Answer to 3. 
      Depend on Whether Knew 1st One Was Unscriptural When Married? 
      5. Answer to 3. 
      Depend on Whether Deceived? 
      6. Answer to 3. 
      Depend on Details of Divorce? 
      7. Any Separation, 
      Grounds, How Long? 
      8. 1 Cor. 7:5 Only 
      Principle Apply to Separation? 
      9. 1 Cor. 7:5 Mean 
      Submit to Drunken Demands, Violence, Perversion? 
      10. Remain If Wife & 
      Child Endangered? 
      11. Legal Steps to 
      Get Out of Harm’s Way? 
      12. After Divorce for 
      Fornication, Reconcile? 
      13. Answer to 12. 
      Depend on Whether Guilty Had Entered Subsequent Marriage? 
      14. 1st 
      Mate Die, Put-away Fornicator Remarry? 
      15. When Man Leaves 
      Faithful Wife Over Her Protest to Marry Another, Does His Adultery Give 
      Her the Ground to Appeal to God to Dissolve Her Marriage Bond? 
      16. If So, May She 
      Marry Again, Or Does She Remain Bound to Him? 
      17. In Divorce for 
      Fornication, Does It Matter Who Initiates Legal Action? 
      18. If Fornicator 
      Sues for Divorce, Must Innocent Mate Countersue? 
      19. On 18., If They 
      Sue in Separate Courts, Does It Matter Who Sued 1st, Which Case 
      Is Decided 1st, Etc. 
      20. If man Drives Out 
      Wife by Abuse, Violence, Etc., & Then Commits Adultery, May She Divorce 
      Him for It? 
      21. Since He Drove 
      Her Out 1st, Would Her Right to Remarry Depend on Who Got to 
      Court 1st?  | 
      
       
      1. Homosexual Marriage 
      2. Polygamy 
      3. Put-away 
      Fornicator May Marry New mate 
      4. Marriage Law Not 
      Apply to Alien Sinner 
      5. Baptism Sanctify 
      Adulterous Marriage 
      6. Deserted Believer 
      Marry New Mate 
      7. Redefine Adultery 
      as Non-sexual 
      8. Repentance Not 
      Require Removal from Unscriptural Marriage 
      9. No Matter Why 
      Divorce, May Take New mate 
      10. God Accept All 
      Marriages Accepted by Legal System
      
        | 
     
   
 
In spite of the above study guide handed out to the 
brethren in Athens, GA. on July 27-28, 2000, along with the documented 
discussion of this subject, Ron and his associates continue to deny that 
he is really “teaching it.” See 
An excerpt of Ron Halbrook’s MDR discussion at Athens, Georgia
and 
“I’m Still Studying It” 
In 
the April, 2001 issue of Gospel Truths (a year after 
the Athens, GA. Discussion), brother J. T. Smith asked Ron to comment on 
the following question: 
“A husband decides to put away his wife and she 
begs him not to. He decides to go ahead and do it anyway. She goes to the church 
and elders and voices her opposition to it. The divorce is final. A few years 
later the husband remarries. She then goes before the church and elders and 
expresses to them that she is now scripturally putting him away. She can then 
remarry without sin.” 
In 
response to the above scenario question 
brother Halbrook wrote: 
“As to your question, I see the problems and 
issues raised by a marriage under such circumstances and would not encourage 
such a remarriage…” 
On page 9 of his April 2001 Gospel Truths 
article (“Why Halbrook Fellowships...”), Ron also refers back to a letter 
that brother Smith wrote to him February 17, 1993. In that letter, J. T. stated 
he had heard that Ron believed this scenario: “When a man puts away his wife 
for any cause other than fornication and he subsequently marries another, his 
first wife then may put him away for fornication and she has the scriptural 
right to marry another.” To this charge, Ron states, “My letter 
dated February 27, 1993 explained that I do not (emp. his) believe 
or teach such a view.” 
Brethren, as one of the numerous men who have been 
tossed to and fro by all of Ron’s double talk through the years, I have 
come to find that brother Halbrook has been less than honest about this issue. 
See the mountain of evidence contrary to his claim (cf. numerous sound 
clips included) which proves the post-divorce “putting away” for 
post-divorce fornication doctrine that Ron has been publicly teaching since from 
at least 1983.  –Jeff
 
 |